|
|
Post by shootingstars on Apr 23, 2009 21:35:46 GMT -6
Any thoughts from the other owners about having the pitcher bat as opposed to a DH? I thought we could implement it in a year or 2 since most of us have a lot of our cap money invested in a DH.
Just a thought. Curious what everyone thinks.
Thanks,
Tim
|
|
|
|
Post by becker on Apr 24, 2009 10:49:32 GMT -6
As I wrote in an email, I'm down with the pitcher hitting in one league. It's workable (as the CBL proved) and I'd have no problem with one league having the pitcher hit and the other the part-time pseudo player, the DH.
I'd want to be in the league where the pitcher hit....
|
|
|
|
Post by happytimefunboy on Apr 29, 2009 14:58:30 GMT -6
I don't like the idea of pitchers batting... As I like the AL format.
Pitchers batting would help our pitchers ERA's but it would also thicken our player pool... since no-one would need the DH.
But if you want to have your pitchers bat feel free when you play me... jk.
|
|
